Hashmark

Wellness privacy assessment

Version wellness-2026-11-01 · Last updated October 31, 2026

English · Français · Español · Português · Deutsch

The short version. Wellness check-ins ask adult players five quick questions a day about how they feel. That is health data, so it is off until a head coach turns it on, each player decides for themselves, only two people read the answers, and everything is deleted after 90 days or the moment a player stops.

This is the data protection impact assessment (DPIA, GDPR Article 35) for Hashmark's wellness check-ins. Vantry LLC, which runs Hashmark, wrote it for the clubs and teams that use the feature. When a head coach or team owner turns wellness on, they accept it for their team. A club may adapt it to its own situation.

1. Who is responsible

2. What it is for

To help the head coach and the team's trainer adjust practice and check in with a player who slept badly, is very sore, is stressed or is in pain, before it turns into an injury. It is not a medical tool. It makes no diagnosis, keeps no medical records and decides nothing on its own.

3. What is collected

AskedAnswer
Sleep1 to 5 (very poor to very restful)
Soreness1 to 5 (none to very sore)
Energy1 to 5 (very low to very high)
Stress1 to 5 (calm to very stressed)
A pain or a small injuryYes or no

With each answer: the date, the time it was sent, the player's account and the team. Each player's yes is kept with its date and the version of this assessment.

Never collected: written notes, where it hurts, diagnoses, treatment, medication, location, wearable or GPS data.

4. Who can take part, and on what basis

5. Who sees the answers

WhoSees
The playerTheir own answers for the last 28 days
The team's head coachThe answers of players who took part, with a readiness score and a red mark for low readiness or pain
One trainer the head coach namesThe same as the head coach. With no trainer named, only the head coach.
Everyone elseNothing: coordinators, position coaches, statisticians, the broadcaster, team owners who aren't the head coach, the club office, parents and other players

The database itself checks these rules on every request; they don't depend on what the app chooses to show. Nobody is listed, counted or reminded for not answering.

6. How long it is kept

7. Where it is kept and how it is protected

8. Is it necessary and proportionate?

9. Risks and what limits them

Risk to the playerWhat limits itWhat's left
Feeling forced to take part, because the coach decides who playsOff by default; each player decides alone; no reminders or list of who hasn't answered; the club commits never to use answers, or not answering, to pick or punish anyone (section 10)Low
Health information seen by people who shouldn'tTwo readers only, checked by the database; parents, the office and teammates see nothingLow
A leak or breachEU hosting, encryption, no direct table access, minimal data, 90 daysLow
A minor's health data18 or older confirmed by the player; players linked to a parent are blocked; the club knows its players' agesLow
Answers used to drop a player or in a contract talkThe score only prompts a conversation; Hashmark decides nothing; the club's commitment (section 10)Low, and in the club's hands
Kept longer than neededNightly deletion after 90 days; deletion when a player stops, wellness is turned off or an account is deletedLow

10. What the club commits to

By turning wellness on, the head coach or owner accepts for the team that:

  1. Answers are used only to plan training and check in with players.
  2. Taking part is optional. Answers, or not answering, are never used to select, drop, fine or rank a player.
  3. The trainer they name keeps the answers confidential.
  4. Players are told the feature is optional before they're asked about it.
  5. The club answers players' requests (see, correct, delete) with Hashmark's help.

11. The player's rights

A player can see their own answers in Hashmark, change today's answer, stop and delete everything with one tap, and ask the club or support@usehashmark.com for a full copy. They can also complain to their data protection authority (in France, the CNIL).

12. Conclusion

With these measures, the remaining risk to players is low, so no prior consultation with a data protection authority is needed (GDPR Article 36). This assessment is reviewed every season and whenever the wellness check-ins change. A change that matters gets a new version, and head coaches accept it again.